AviationBull

  • main
  • about us
  • contact us
  • links
  • projects

Welcome

Welcome to AviationBull, and thanks for stopping by. We designed this site to be a place where folks can discuss current events in aviation, so please feel free to look around and drop a couple of comments on the articles we've written. Make sure to stop by our projects page and our popular LSA comparison page to see what we've got cooking there. We're always looking for feedback to make the site better as well, so if you've got suggestions for a story, or just want to say hi you can send us a note here. Thanks for reading AviationBull, where pilots go to shoot the bull...

Home › Content

Pulse Detonation Engine Takes Off

Ted — Tue, 03/18/2008 - 10:28

The "Woracle" blog over at FlightGlobal has a great article about the first flight of a pretty revolutionary new engine. The engine is called a Pulse Detonation Engine (PDE) and is being developed through a partnership between the Air Force Research Labs (AFRL), ISSI and Scaled Composites. The design reminds me of a Pulse Jet Engine (pulsejet), but with a few more moving parts and a great deal more finesse.

  • Research and Development
  • 1179 reads

pulse jet - DWPE

Unidentified Target — Thu, 11/13/2008 - 17:52

? In my half Century in unorthodox propulsion I have followed a
path contrary to advices of experts, not cared much about the state of
art. This allowed me to avoid many mistakes reputable Companies and
innumerable amateurs make.
One of the confusions relate to difference between ordinary pulse
jet and DWPE.
It is the same difference as between stock car and formula 1
racing car.
Second myth is that resonant pulse jet is somehow better than
other jets. Relatively only, when compared to haphazard jets.
Resonance involves waves which take away power, even as it is true
that in pulse jets of any kind the power is interrupted. Detonation
frequency is of utmost importance and compensates generously for
inadequacy of the design We can see technically inferior modeller’ jets
having high efficiency precisely for this reason. Small engine naturally
has high frequency, basically because filling the chamber is quick.
Many people cannot learn from SNECMA Escopette engines’ example. .
Nobody seems to ask question why the French used six engines to
power a glider instead one in middle or two on sides.
Another myth taught by Institutions of learning is that range of
speed in pulse jet is between Mach 0.5 to Mach 3.0,
It shows that imagination and designer instinct is conversely
related to amount of money available for research. I would put limit,
according to my present experiences, to Mach Thirty. All necessary is
to follow laws of physics, have open mind and not repeat mistakes of
others.
Top of the line detonation wave engine’s qualities are in the
name. It operates using detonations. not conflagrations.
In such engine the detonation must be initiated at the front wall,
be short, violent and discrete, not connected to previous one. This
avoids the unacceptable Kadenacy effect, provided the intake cross-
section is sufficient, not creating strong negative pressure to draw
exiting gases back. In hot engine, it cannot be prevented that the fuel
mixture is ignited on all sides. The front ignition must be more intense
and because of second condition of the mixture volume length not
exceeding its diameter this effect is minimal. In over-filled chamber
there are reflection waves causing low efficiency and waste of fuel .
Conflagration is slow process.
It is obvious that difference between ordinary pulse jet and DWPE
is in organisation of the function. Your GRANDDAD
www.philonline.com.ph/~eron2

  • reply

Point Taken...

Ted — Mon, 06/23/2008 - 21:30

However, the term finesse was meant to apply to the way in which the "SHOCK" wave is controlled allowing for hypersonic implementation with the PDE.

  • reply

"a great deal more finesse"???

Unidentified Target — Thu, 06/19/2008 - 22:07

I do not see how the propagation of a combustion driven SHOCK wave of the PDE can be considered to have more finesse than a combustion driven resonant acoustic mode used in the pulsejet. Your choice of words does not accurately reflect the physical mechanisms behind the operation of each propulsion system.

  • reply

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human.
3 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Search

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Popular content

Today's:

  • Wiki Aircraft Identification
  • Why Smart Pilots Avoid MOAs (long)
  • Thielert Troubles Influencing Other Manufacturers
  • Some Effects of Washington DC ADIZ Extended for 60 Miles

All time:

  • Light Sport Aircraft Comparison OLD

Your Ad Here


rss
RSS Feed

Add AviationBull to your Bloglines

Add AviationBull to your Google

Add AviationBull to your My Yahoo

Add AviationBull to your Netvibes

Add AviationBull to your Newsgator

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
  • main
  • about us
  • contact us
  • links
  • projects

Links owned by their publisher's, Posts owned by their poster's, everything else © Aviationbull 2007 - 2008